It really is Bush’s fault, Part 2: Monetary mayhem

This is the second in a continuing series reviewing the economic policies of President George W. Bush. In the first post, I discussed why the temporary nature of the 2001/2003 tax cuts drained them of any deep economic benefit. While that fiscal policy was bad enough (without the permanence, it was pure Keynesian opium), monetary policy for much of the Bush the Younger Administration was just as bad.

From 2002 to 2005, interest rates were kept well below what would have normally been the case in the 1980s and (most of) the 1990s. Because the Federal Reserve does this largely via buying U.S. Treasury notes, the effect merely compounded the inflationary effect of the temporary tax cuts. As I noted yesterday, the inflation of the aughts was especially notable in resources – including land, which average Americans saw as the housing bubble.

Of course, when it comes to monetary policy, there is precious little an incumbent president can do – except when the Fed Chairman’s term is up. Bush had a unique opportunity to make it clear that ad hoc monetary policy engineered by Alan Greenspan in 2002 was not his policy, and make a change.

Instead, Bush quickly renominated Greenspan for another term in 2004.

Now, some may note that Bush might not have wanted to “rock the boat” in an election year. Except that in a much more obviously political position, he did just that in the same year when he appointed Porter Goss – a longtime critic of American intelligence operations – as CIA Director. So Bush the Younger was clearly up for taking risks. Unfortunately for the American economy, fixing a growing monetary mess wasn’t on Bush’s agenda.

As a result, not only did the bubble/credit cycle continue to spin out of control, but when it burst, the Fed’s already low interest rates couldn’t go much lower – and the Fed resorted to qualitative easing (now three times) under Greenspan’s successor – Ben Bernake, whom Bush nominated to replace Greenspan.

In other words, two men were largely responsible for the Fed going off the rails on monetary policy, and thus unintentionally making it nearly impotent today…and President Bush appointed both of them.

Cross-posted to Virginia Virtucon

About these ads

5 Responses to It really is Bush’s fault, Part 2: Monetary mayhem

  1. [...] Even by that point, however, the Keynesian high from temporary tax cuts, reckless spending, and monetary mayhem had run its course, leaving trouble in its [...]

  2. [...] Even by that point, however, the Keynesian high from temporary tax cuts, reckless spending, and monetary mayhem had run its course, leaving trouble in its [...]

  3. [...] for the reasons usually aimed at him). I have mentioned the damaging effects of temporary tax cuts, loose money, and rampant [...]

  4. [...] for the reasons usually aimed at him). I have mentioned the damaging effects of temporary tax cuts, loose money, and rampant [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers

%d bloggers like this: