The Daily Mail (UK) noticed that one of the global-warming-alarmist hubs (East Anglia University), just let the cat out of the bag:
Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.
Oops.
For the unitiated, there have been so many instances of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can barely keep up with them; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at thirty-four.
Among other things, the piece shows that the anti-alarmists in the scientific community are finding their voices. Check out the comments from Henrik Svensmark, director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research at Denmark’s National Space Institute:
It will take a long battle to convince some climate scientists that the sun is important. It may well be that the sun is going to demonstrate this on its own, without the need for their help.
Ouch!
Could be a rough decade for Mann, Jones, et al.
Cross-posted to Virginia Virtucon
[...] to the right-wing liberal Share this:FacebookTwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]
Didn’t you hear? 2010 was the hottest land / sea year in recorded history and last year was the 9th. In fact 13 of the hottest years have been in the last 15.
Oops.
And that’s based on what data?
Sorry, Drew, but that won’t fly here. The old “1990s was the hottest decade” mantra fell apart when NASA admitted they underestimated the 1930s. Perhaps you missed that.
[...] This matters for three reasons: 1) as Homewood himself notes, the GHCN data is the source data for NASA-GISS and East Anglia University’s HADCRUT, the two largest and most prominent intellectual bases for global warming alarmism; 2) the Arctic Circle is not only the place that has seen the most “warming” over the years, but it is also the most sensitive region for its supposed after effects (due to ice melting, which is also not exactly going according to the alarmists’ plan, but that’s another story); and 3) this adds one more to the slew of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can chronicle over the years; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at a whopping thirty-five. [...]
[...] This matters for three reasons: 1) as Homewood himself notes, the GHCN data is the source data for NASA-GISS and East Anglia University’s HADCRUT, the two largest and most prominent intellectual bases for global warming alarmism; 2) the Arctic Circle is not only the place that has seen the most “warming” over the years, but it is also the most sensitive region for its supposed after effects (due to ice melting, which is also not exactly going according to the alarmists’ plan, but that’s another story); and 3) this adds one more to the slew of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can chronicle over the years; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at a whopping thirty-five. [...]
[...] Before today the number of various and sundry errors, data manipulations, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can chronicle over the years were so numerous that I managed to blog a whopping thirty-five posts on this particular subject. [...]
[...] over the years were so numerous that I managed to blog a whopping thirty-five posts on this particular [...]
[...] warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since last [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since November of 2009. Mann has been one at the center of this junk for over a dozen years, ever since [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmists, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009 just under three years [...]
[...] from global warming alarmists, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009 just under three years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject sinceClimategate broke in November of 2009 just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject sinceClimategate broke in November of 2009 just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years ago. More to the […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years ago. More to the […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years ago…and […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years ago…and […]