The global-warming crowd at NASA-GISS was called out for manipulating data to fit their alarmist nonsense, again.
(For the unitiated, there have been so many instances of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can barely keep up with them; the number of my posts alone on this subject stood at thirty-three; now it’s thirty-four).
In this case, GISS made some “corrections” to the Reykjavik data. The Icelandic capital had particularly warm spell between 1940 and 1965 (roughly). Well, “GISS, as the blue line shows, have magically made this warm period disappear, by reducing the real temperatures by up to nearly 2 degrees” (Not A Lot of People Know That via WUWT).
Chart courtesy Paul Homewood (Not A Lot of People Know That – via WUWT)
Suffice to say, the locals are not happy (emphasis in original):
Meanwhile the Iceland Met Office say that “The GHCN “corrections” are grossly in error in the case of Reykjavik”.
Whoops.
Cross-posted to Virginia Virtucon
[...] to the right-wing liberal Share this:FacebookTwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]
[...] For the unitiated, there have been so many instances of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can barely keep up with them; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at thirty-four. [...]
[...] For the unitiated, there have been so many instances of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can barely keep up with them; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at thirty-four. [...]
[...] This matters for three reasons: 1) as Homewood himself notes, the GHCN data is the source data for NASA-GISS and East Anglia University’s HADCRUT, the two largest and most prominent intellectual bases for global warming alarmism; 2) the Arctic Circle is not only the place that has seen the most “warming” over the years, but it is also the most sensitive region for its supposed after effects (due to ice melting, which is also not exactly going according to the alarmists’ plan, but that’s another story); and 3) this adds one more to the slew of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can chronicle over the years; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at a whopping thirty-five. [...]
[...] This matters for three reasons: 1) as Homewood himself notes, the GHCN data is the source data for NASA-GISS and East Anglia University’s HADCRUT, the two largest and most prominent intellectual bases for global warming alarmism; 2) the Arctic Circle is not only the place that has seen the most “warming” over the years, but it is also the most sensitive region for its supposed after effects (due to ice melting, which is also not exactly going according to the alarmists’ plan, but that’s another story); and 3) this adds one more to the slew of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can chronicle over the years; the number of my posts alone on this subject now stand at a whopping thirty-five. [...]
[...] Before today the number of various and sundry errors, data manipulations, and other shenanigans, from global warming alarmists that the rest of us can chronicle over the years were so numerous that I managed to blog a whopping thirty-five posts on this particular subject. [...]
[...] can chronicle over the years were so numerous that I managed to blog a whopping thirty-five posts on this particular [...]
[...] global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since last [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since last [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since November of 2009. Mann has been one at the center of this junk for over a dozen years, ever [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmism, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject over the last two and a half [...]
[...] from global warming alarmists, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009 just under three years [...]
[...] from global warming alarmists, and that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009 just under three years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject sinceClimategate broke in November of 2009 just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject sinceClimategate broke in November of 2009 just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[...] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years [...]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years ago. More to […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a half years ago. More to […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a […]
[…] that’s just from what I’ve been able to blog on this subject since Climategate broke in November of 2009, just under three and a […]