One would think that after the numerous findings and reports of data fudging and other shenanigans (since this past November, I have been posting on the slew of errors, data manipulation, and other shenanigans that have been plagued cliamte change alarmism; including today’s post, we are now up to thirty-one of them), the fplks at East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit would know better than this (Steve Goddard at WUWT):
HadCrut released their January 1850 through June 2010 temperature data yesterday, and something “interesting” happened. Their temperature anomalies from January-April jumped up from their published values on June 3.
. . .
HadCrut still shows 1998 hotter than 2010 so far, but they seem to be working on “correcting” that problem.
Why is it that post facto adjustments always seem to be upwards in later years, and downwards in earlier years? This whole global temperature business looks like a complete joke to me.
Did they really think we wouldn’t notice?
