Sports radio has been all over the Gilbert Arenas gun incident, but the Virginia blogosphere has (from what I can tell) been largely silent. Being that I’m the lone (or at least one of the very few) bloggers in the Commonwealth who follows the NBA, it’s high time I say a few words here.
To be honest, what threw me was Al Sharpton calling on Commissioner David Stern to come down on Arenas. Seeing Sharpton use this as an opportunity to play political gatekeeper (i.e., it’s OK to criticize a high-profile African-American player because Al Sharpton says we could) just sticks in my craw.
Finally, there was the gun-control crowd, who are happily using this as the latest excuse to conduct surgery on the 2nd Amendment.
However, there are two issues here. The first is DC’s ridiculous gun restrictions, which were so bad as to be partially tossed out by the Supreme Court. The other issue is (to put it in legalese) the rights of the Association. The NBA isn’t the government, and they can choose to do what they like based on what’s best for the NBA.
The NBA prohibits guns in arenas, with the arenas’ obvious consent. They have property rights, too, rights Arenas violated when he brought the guns – loaded or unloaded – into the building.
Based on this ESPN accout, Stern was probably going to wait until the DC investigation was completed, but decided Agent Zero’s flippant attitude forced his hand. I’m not so sure about that – some people use humor as a deflection mechanism – but even Arenas himself understands he doesn’t have a leg to stand on here.
Again, if David Stern were a government official imposing a fine or jail time (and if the guns were unloaded, as is now apparent), I’d be more than a little upset. He’s not; he’s the CEO of a private corporation acting well within his right in what he thinks (and I am compelled to agree) is in the best interests of said corporation.
As for me, this seems like a good time to end my flirtation with the ‘Zards and accept the pain of being a Knicks fan again.