What if a bank doesn’t want Uncle Sam’s money? They have no choice.

The Treasury Department has shifted from buying “bad” loans to seizing bank stock via eminent domain (Washington Post):

Community banking executives around the country responded with anger yesterday to the Bush administration’s strategy of investing $250 billion in financial firms, saying they don’t need the money, resent the intrusion and feel it’s unfair to rescue companies from their own mistakes.

But regulators said some banks will be pressed to take the taxpayer dollars anyway. Others banks judged too sick to save will be allowed to fail.

If that’s not bad enough, check out the Wall Street Journal account (via Sweetness and Light, emphasis added):

It was Monday afternoon at 3 p.m. at the Treasury headquarters. Messrs. Paulson and Bernanke had called one of the most important gatherings of bankers in American history. For an hour, the nine executives drank coffee and water and listened to the two men paint a dire portrait of the U.S. economy and the unfolding financial crisis. As the meeting neared a close, each banker was handed a term sheet detailing how the government would take stakes valued at a combined $125 billion in their banks, and impose new restrictions on executive pay and dividend policies.

The participants, among the nation’s best deal makers, were in a peculiar position. They weren’t allowed to negotiate. Mr. Paulson requested that each of them sign. It was for their own good and the good of the country, he said, according to a person in the room.

This isn’t a bailout; this isn’t about the economy; this is a raw power grab, pure and simple.

Disgusting.

11 Responses to What if a bank doesn’t want Uncle Sam’s money? They have no choice.

  1. George Templeton says:

    We only have two and half more months of these people and they will be gone!

  2. [...] are understandable.  Heck, watching the Bush Administration cave into North Korea and seize pieces of our leading banks by eminent domain, one would be forgiven for thinking Obama is already [...]

  3. [...] over at Powerline (h/t Mark Steyn @ NRO – The Corner) provides a critical reminder of something I noticed last October - more than a few banks took the “bailout” money at the point of a gun: Wells Fargo [...]

  4. [...] – such as numerous TARP recipients who received capital “injections” that were really an eminent domain stock seizure in disguise.  If the Treasury Department gets the power it wants to “help” non-banking firms [...]

  5. [...] Yet almost two years after it happened, Cathy Crabill can’t bring herself to oppose this. [...]

  6. [...] Yet almost two years after it happened, Cathy Crabill can’t bring herself to oppose this. [...]

  7. [...] Yet almost two years after it happened, Cathy Crabill can’t bring herself to oppose this. [...]

  8. [...] As bad as that bait and switch was, Paulsen then dragged healthy banks into it – literally forcing them to take TARP money in a de facto eminent domain move that would have made New London [...]

  9. [...] As bad as that bait and switch was, Paulsen then dragged healthy banks into it – literally forcing them to take TARP money in a de facto eminent domain move that would have made New London [...]

  10. [...] As bad as that bait and switch was, Paulsen then dragged healthy banks into it – literally forcing them to take TARP money in a de facto eminent domain move that would have made New London [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.