Three questions

As we get more details on the nuclear know-how Communist China handed over to Iran (“blueprints for ’shaping’ uranium metal into warheads, the testing of high explosives used to detonate radioactive material and the procurement of dual-use technology”), three questions come to mind.

1) Can we all agree that the Iranian mullahcracy is a dangerous regime?

2) Is anyone even considering how to hold the Communist regime accountable for helping its best Middle Eastern ally along the path to nuclear weaponry?

3) Is helping Mad Mouthpiece Mahmoud get the toys he needs to eliminate Israel enough for us to say we’re staying home from the Olympics?

Cross-posted to the Shotgun

5 Responses to “Three questions”

  1. Thomas Says:

    Sure we can agree that the Iranian regime is a VERY dangerous regime, just slightly less dangerous than the Bush dictatorship. 2) Your boy George has already sold the US to China so the idea that we will do anything to stop them is simply ludicrous. Also, calling China a communist country is like calling the US a democracy. They are a totalitarian regime that has embraced the free market so wholeheartedly it would make J.P. Morgan blush. In fact, I would suspect that most right wingers are jealous of the Chinese system. Imagine how much more money you could make without regulation and rules. It must keep you awake at night.

  2. rightwingliberal Says:

    If you really think Communist China has “free market,” you are completely ingorant about economics.

  3. Thomas Says:

    Well, I’m glad to see that you agree with my other points at least. I would submit to you that if you think they are communist, you are completely ignorant of the definition of the word. If they were truly communist they would be somewhere between Cuba and North Korea in economic growth and not kicking our ass and owning all of our dollars. oh, and by the way you can rest assured that GHWB will be front and center during the opening ceremonies, if for no other reason than to pay respects to his countries owners.

  4. rightwingliberal Says:

    Actually, Tommy, I disagree on all points. Bush is hardly a “dictator,” and while I’m not happy with the arge piee of American debt and assets that Communist China owns, it still isn’t even as much as British or German ownership.

    It is still Communist China, because the CCP still controls the economy. They simply donned business suits, fleece foreign investors, and fool useful idiots like you.

  5. Thomas Says:

    I never quite understood why you neo-facist boys are so quick with the personal insult. You should learn to curb the anger, it weakens your argument. Also, get over the Communist angle. It is on its last legs, no matter what you think. I know that you will need to find a new boggieman, but yor resourceful.

Leave a Reply