Obama’s advisor: Blame Canada!

Austan Goolsbee, Barack Obama’s senior economic adviser, is trying to get out an embarrassing situation by playing dumb and blaming our biggest trading partner and most friendly neighbor - Canada (AP via Fox News):

Barack Obama’s senior economic policy adviser said Sunday that Canadian government officials wrote an inaccurate portrayal of his private discussion on the campaign’s trade policy in a memo obtained by The Associated Press.

The memo is the first documentation to emerge publicly out of the meeting between the adviser, Austan Goolsbee, and officials with the Canadian consulate in Chicago, but Goolsbee said it misinterprets what he told them. The memo was written by Joseph DeMora, who works for the consulate and attended the meeting.

Goolsbee disputed a section that read: “Noting anxiety among many U.S. domestic audiences about the U.S. economic outlook, Goolsbee candidly acknowledged the protectionist sentiment that has emerged, particularly in the Midwest, during the primary campaign. He cautioned that this messaging should not be taken out of context and should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.”

“This thing about `it’s more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans,’ that’s this guy’s language,” Goolsbee said of DeMora. “He’s not quoting me.

“I certainly did not use that phrase in any way,” Goolsbee said.

So now, in order to prevent anyone from looking behind the curtain for the truthbehind the Audacity of Hype, Goolsbee would rather set off an international incident with Canada.  Either that, or he is a complete ignoramus on political matters.

Why do I say that?  Take a look at this piece of the story:

He said the visit lasted about 40 minutes, and perhaps two to three minutes were spent discussing NAFTA. He said the Canadians asked about Obama’s position, and he replied about his interest in improving labor and environmental standards, and they raised some concerns that Obama sounds like a protectionist.

He said he responded that Obama is not a protectionist, but that the Illinois senator tries to strike a balance between the economic struggles of working Americans and recognizing that free trade is good for the economy.

“That’s a pretty ham-handed description of what I answered,” Goolsbee said of memo’s account. “A: In no possible way was that a reference to NAFTA. And B: In no possible way was I inferring that he was going to introduce any policies that you should ignore and he had no intention of enacting. Those are both completely crazy.”

“In no possible way was that a reference to NAFTA”?  Is he kidding?  The entire question came out of a NAFTA discussion.  Moreover, Canada is the largest exporter to us, and we’re its biggest export market – and someone of Goolsbee’s stature should know that.  It is impossible for any Canadian official to have a discussion on trade, politics, and the American presidency without it impacting NAFTA.

If Obama or his staff had even the most limited foreign policy experience, they would know this.  They would understand that you can’t speak about NAFTA in any way without Canada getting nervous.  To imply that the Canadian consulate is making stuff up is hardly the way to address that problem.

The late Patrick Moynihan once famously said of Jimmy Carter, “Unable to distinguish between our friends and our enemies, he has essentially adopted our enemies’ view of the world” (NRO).  Obama clearly has the first troubling part down.  Do we really want to have him complete the sentence, and repeat history, in the White House?

5 Responses to “Obama’s advisor: Blame Canada!”

  1. kb Says:

    All he is suited for is the corruption of Illinois politics. From the beginning, I sensed something was “wrong” with his rhetoric. It didn’t quite match up with my instincts about him.

    Hillary is the only one to lead this country from where it now stands – not in good shape domestically or internationally.

  2. bk Says:

    This is a good indication of what the people have to look forward too. He goes behind the backs of the American people and tells Canada he has no intention of doing what he said “its just politics.” He is saying is that all his rhetoric is just to get elected and he has no intention of doing what he says.
    Obama is also slapping the majority of the Senate in the face who voted for the war that he has better judgement than they do. These are the very Senators he has to work with in order to get anything passed. A clear indication he looks at the smaller picture. Hillary’s one vote would not have changed the war as Obama tries to make you believe. He also says he is against vouchers for schools, but he could be pursuaded to vote for it. Voted over 100 times “Present” He can’t make a decision! I will not vote for this man to run our country.

  3. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » » Obama Lies, Canadians Cry Says:

    [...] our friends, Obama’s inexperience and flawed thinking on foreign policy is disturbing. As Right Wing Liberal points out: “The late Patrick Moynihan once famously said of Jimmy Carter, ‘Unable to distinguish [...]

  4. Riley Says:

    I actually know Austan. Small world. Haven’t seen him since he was at Yale, though.

  5. athy Says:

    How Obama is spinning his ‘mistake’.

    CTV News

    http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080227/dems_nafta_080227/20080227?hub=CTVNewsAt11
    The controversy began last week when CTV, a Canadian television network, reported that an Obama official had called the Canadian ambassador in Washington to play down the significance of Mr. Obama’s criticism of Nafta.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/politics/04nafta.html?_r=2&st=cse&sq=obama+nafta&scp=9&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
    The Obama campaign and the Canadian Embassy issued denials that were, it appears, technically accurate. But they were incomplete because they did not address Mr. Goolsbee’s meeting with Canadian officials.
    When WKYC-TV in Ohio asked Mr. Obama about the CTV report, he said:
    “I don’t have to clarify it.
    The Canadian Embassy already clarified it by saying the story was not true.
    And our office has said the story was not.
    And so I think it’s important for viewers to understand that it was not true.”
    When pressed, he said, “It did not happen.”

    Memo published by New York Times

    http://www.nytimes.com/images/promos/politics/blog/20070303canmemo.pdf

    Now, Obama is lying about what may have happened and Obama supporters are ‘pushing’ this lie as truth on blogs. Here is 1 story hitting the blogs…

    “Canadian Consulate in Chicago reached out to an econ professor at the U of Chicago (Goolsbee)-who happens to be an Obama advisor. U of Chicago professor comes to visit but doesn’t think enough of it to tell the campaign. Consulate scribe writes a disputable interpretation of the conversation. Disputed interpretation gets leaked by Conservative Party (~Canada’s GOP) PM’s office in a way that makes the actual conversation difficult to identify since the purported speaker doesn’t remember making those comments and the details of the conversation didn’t match the initial description provided:”

    My response….
    Hmmmm…..
    This is the second time that I can recall where Sen Obama claims that he did not know that someone from his campaign made a ‘high-level’ controversial visit to foreign govt but the campaign staff member….f o r g o t ….to tell Obama….

    http://www.nysun.com/article/71123
    The New York Sun 2/12/08 “Obama Adviser Leads Delegation to Damascus By Eli Lake Supposidly Sen. Obama had no idea that ZB, one of his foreign advisors at the time, was making a trip to Syria several weeks ago???

    ZB…forget to tell Obama? U of Chicago professor…forget to tell Obama?…….What’s wrong with this picture?

Leave a Reply